On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>> No new code here ;). There is a slight change of execution path, i.e. some
>> VEC_PERM_EXPRs (e.g. those for reductions via shifts) will be expanded
>> using
>> arm_expand_vec_perm_const rather than the vec_shr pattern. This generates
>> EXT
No new code here ;). There is a slight change of execution path, i.e. some
VEC_PERM_EXPRs (e.g. those for reductions via shifts) will be expanded using
arm_expand_vec_perm_const rather than the vec_shr pattern. This generates EXT
instructions equivalent to the original, but using the mode of the s
