RE: [PATCH,MIPS] Refine configure guard for .module availability

2014-11-21 Thread Matthew Fortune
Matthew Fortune writes: > (I'm not sure if I need approval from someone else for MIPS specific > top level 'configure' changes. I'm cautiously assuming I do for now.) FWIW, MIPS maintainership covers all MIPS-specific code and documentation (except for externally-maintained code) so you don't

[PATCH,MIPS] Refine configure guard for .module availability

2014-11-21 Thread Matthew Fortune
(I'm not sure if I need approval from someone else for MIPS specific top level 'configure' changes. I'm cautiously assuming I do for now.) Since adding o32 FFPXX support, the MIPS backend uses the .module directive to emit a .module [no]oddspreg when .module support is detected in binutils. The