Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite

2019-08-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:54:30AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 07:29:10PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > > OK to commit? > > > > OK with > > > > %s/rational/relational/g > > > > and with Mark's nit. > > > > Thanks a lot for going down that road. I li

Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite

2019-08-10 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 07:29:10PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > OK to commit? > > OK with > > %s/rational/relational/g > > and with Mark's nit. > > Thanks a lot for going down that road. I like the approach of > -fallow-invalid-boz to downgrade the error to a warning, which >

Re: [PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite

2019-08-10 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Steve, OK to commit? OK with %s/rational/relational/g and with Mark's nit. Thanks a lot for going down that road. I like the approach of -fallow-invalid-boz to downgrade the error to a warning, which then cannot be turned off. Regards Thomas

[PATCH,Fortran] -- Tidy up the BOZ rewrite

2019-08-08 Thread Steve Kargl
The attach patch has been regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. It does a number of things. 1) It tightens the adherence to F2018 Fortran standard. For example, this program and execute with gfortran 9 and older. program foo integer i data i/z'40490adf'/ ! Explicit declarat