Hi all, Janne!
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:40:01 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 20:57, Janne Blomqvist
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:58 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> > > wrote
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 10:30:30 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 03:25, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> >
> > On 09/05/2018 07:57 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The fortran frontend still uses stack-based handling of (symbol) names
> > > with fixed-si
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 20:57, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:58 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> > wrote:
>
> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-foo-linux.
> >>
> >> I'd appreciate if someone could dou
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 20:57, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:58 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-foo-linux.
>>
>> I'd appreciate if someone could double check for regressions on other
>> setups. Git branch:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/g
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:58 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <
rep.dot@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The fortran frontend still uses stack-based handling of (symbol) names
> with fixed-sized buffers. Furthermore these buffers often are too small
> when dealing with F2003 identifiers which can be up t
Hi,
The fortran frontend still uses stack-based handling of (symbol) names
with fixed-sized buffers. Furthermore these buffers often are too small
when dealing with F2003 identifiers which can be up to, including 63
bytes long.
Other frontends use the stringpool since many years.
This janitorial
