Re: [PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-05-05 Thread Christian Bruel
thanks for the validation and the confirmation that iinline-attr.c is now fixed on aarch64. I can now send the patch for submission request (this one was just illustrative). thanks Christian On 05/05/2015 11:10 AM, Yvan Roux wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 4 May 2015 at 11:29, Christian Bruel wr

Re: [PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-05-05 Thread Yvan Roux
Hi Christian, On 4 May 2015 at 11:29, Christian Bruel wrote: > >> Hi Christian, >> I noticed case gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c failed on aarch64. The >> original patch is x86 specific, while the case is added as general >> one. Could you please have a look at this? >> >> FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-a

Re: [PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-05-04 Thread Christian Bruel
> Hi Christian, > I noticed case gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c failed on aarch64. The > original patch is x86 specific, while the case is added as general > one. Could you please have a look at this? > > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline > "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test" > t

Re: [PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-04-30 Thread Christian Bruel
OK I've have a look, thanks Christian On 04/30/2015 10:27 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel >> wrote: >>> While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the >>> alignment flag

Re: [PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-04-30 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel > wrote: >> While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the >> alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used. >> >> With the attached testcases

Re: [PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-04-27 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Christian Bruel wrote: > While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the > alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used. > > With the attached testcases, the visible effects are twofold : > > 1) Functions compiled

[PATCH, x86] Add TARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS_AFTER_CHANGE hook

2015-02-04 Thread Christian Bruel
While trying to reduce the PR64835 case for ARM and x86, I noticed that the alignment flags are cleared for x86 when attribute optimized is used. With the attached testcases, the visible effects are twofold : 1) Functions compiled in with attribute optimize (-O2) are not aligned as if they wer