On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Saying that, I see we don't need to define ASM_SUFFIX anymore. I'll
> prepare the patch that removes these #defines.
2015-12-09 Uros Bizjak
* gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-roundps-1.c: Remove ASM_SUFFIX define.
* gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-ro
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 08.12.2015 um 19:23 schrieb Uros Bizjak:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
this patch fixes the asm statements in the gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-round*
test cases.
They do lots o
Hi,
Am 08.12.2015 um 19:23 schrieb Uros Bizjak:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>>> this patch fixes the asm statements in the gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-round*
>>> test cases.
>>>
>>> They do lots of things that are just absolutely forbidden, like clobber
>>> regi
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> this patch fixes the asm statements in the gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-round*
>> test cases.
>>
>> They do lots of things that are just absolutely forbidden, like clobber
>> registers
>> that are not mentioned in the clobber list, and c
Hello!
> this patch fixes the asm statements in the gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-round* test
> cases.
>
> They do lots of things that are just absolutely forbidden, like clobber
> registers
> that are not mentioned in the clobber list, and create a hidden data flow.
>
> The test cases work just by cha
Hi,
this patch fixes the asm statements in the gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-round* test
cases.
They do lots of things that are just absolutely forbidden, like clobber
registers
that are not mentioned in the clobber list, and create a hidden data flow.
The test cases work just by chance, and You can
