> On 15 Aug 2018, at 20:07, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>> One of my Grand Ideas (i.e. things that might never happen because of
>> time) would be to split out the Well Known Sections used by GCC into
>> file/files with .defs for the different flavours.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> One of my Grand Ideas (i.e. things that might never happen because of
> time) would be to split out the Well Known Sections used by GCC into
> file/files with .defs for the different flavours. This would mean one
> place to add a new GCC named section -
> On 15 Aug 2018, at 19:39, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>> The fails on Darwin are because the section naming convention is different.
>>
>> The patch adds Darwin-specific section attributes and a corresponding
>> target-specific scan-assembler c
On Aug 15, 2018, at 6:20 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> The fails on Darwin are because the section naming convention is different.
>
> The patch adds Darwin-specific section attributes and a corresponding
> target-specific scan-assembler clause.
>
> OK for trunk?
> affected branches (7, 8)?
Ok.
Hi,
The fails on Darwin are because the section naming convention is different.
The patch adds Darwin-specific section attributes and a corresponding
target-specific scan-assembler clause.
OK for trunk?
affected branches (7, 8)?
thanks
Iain
2018-08-15 Iain Sandoe
gcc/testsuite:
PR
