On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The little-endian implementation of vec_sums is incorrect. I had
> misread the specification and thought that the fields not containing the
> result value were undefined, but in fact they are defined to contain
> zero. My previous i
Hi,
The little-endian implementation of vec_sums is incorrect. I had
misread the specification and thought that the fields not containing the
result value were undefined, but in fact they are defined to contain
zero. My previous implementation used a vector splat to copy the field
from BE elemen
