On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:24:52PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > For all the scan-assembler tests, did you verify these are exactly the
> > instructions we want generated?
>
> "want" may be a bit strong, but I do verified that is what we get now.
The difference is if the testcases start failing
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 12:33 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:14:31AM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > Add some testcases for verification of vec_insert() codegen.
> > The char,float,int,short tests are broken out into -p8 and -p9
> > variants due to codegen var
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:14:31AM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> Add some testcases for verification of vec_insert() codegen.
> The char,float,int,short tests are broken out into -p8 and -p9
> variants due to codegen variations between the platforms.
>
> Tested across assorted power linux pl
Hi,
Add some testcases for verification of vec_insert() codegen.
The char,float,int,short tests are broken out into -p8 and -p9
variants due to codegen variations between the platforms.
Tested across assorted power linux platforms. OK for trunk?
Thanks
-Will
[testsuite]
2018-10-10 W
