Hi!
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 07:46:26AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
> because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
> former generates sibcalls for nonlocal function calls, but the latter does
>
Hi David,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:27:42AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
> > because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
> > forme
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
> because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
> former generates sibcalls for nonlocal function calls, but the latter does
> not.
Hi,
Segher discovered that one of the new safe-indirect-jump tests fails on AIX
because of a difference between AIX_V4 and AIX_ABI for 32-bit code. The
former generates sibcalls for nonlocal function calls, but the latter does
not. Thus this test should be skipped for AIX.
Okay for trunk and po
