Good idea, Mike, I'll make that change.
Thanks,
Bill
On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 16:54 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > The test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-34.c fails if a
> > loop isn't vectorized. When compiled for little endian, the c
On Dec 2, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> The test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-34.c fails if a
> loop isn't vectorized. When compiled for little endian, the cost of
> vectorizing the loop is deemed too high
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-3
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> The test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-34.c fails if a
> loop isn't vectorized. When compiled for little endian, the cost of
> vectorizing the loop is deemed too high to vectorize due to unaligned
> vector accesses within the lo
The test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-34.c fails if a
loop isn't vectorized. When compiled for little endian, the cost of
vectorizing the loop is deemed too high to vectorize due to unaligned
vector accesses within the loop. Therefore we should skip this test for
LE.
Verified on
