Uli, thanks. Sorry I misunderstood what you said the first time. I'm
currently testing this version, which I've verified fixes the bug. I'll
plan to commit the new version after testing provided neither you nor
David objects.
Thanks!
Bill
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 17:17 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote
David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_preferred_reload_class): Disallow
> > PLUS rtx's from reloading into a superset of FLOAT_REGS; relax
> > constraint on constants to only prevent them from bei
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've encountered a rare bug that occurs when attempting to reload for
> an unaligned store in DImode. For an unaligned store, using stfd gets
> preference over std since stfd doesn't have an alignment restriction and
> therefore the
Hi,
We've encountered a rare bug that occurs when attempting to reload for
an unaligned store in DImode. For an unaligned store, using stfd gets
preference over std since stfd doesn't have an alignment restriction and
therefore the "m" constraint matches. However, when there is not a
register av
