> Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> Kevin Nilsen wrote:
>
>> This patch has bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and=
>> powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and=20
>> powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0 (big endian) with no regressions. Is it ok to
>> fix this on t
Kevin Nilsen wrote:
> This patch has bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and=
> powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and=20
> powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0 (big endian) with no regressions. Is it ok t=
> o fix this on the trunk?
>
> The problem described i
This patch has bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and
powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and
powerpc64-unknown-freebsd11.0 (big endian) with no regressions. Is it ok to
fix this on the trunk?
The problem described in PR66337
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi