On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 10:27 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>
>>> >Updated patch with above comments incorporated. Bootstrap/regtest on
>>> > BE/LE
>>> >with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
>>
>> 2014-04-08 Pat Haugen
>>
>> * config/rs6000/rs600
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 10:27 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>
>>> >Updated patch with above comments incorporated. Bootstrap/regtest on
>>> > BE/LE
>>> >with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
>>
>> 2014-04-08 Pat Haugen
>>
>> * config/rs6000/rs600
On 04/16/2014 10:27 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>Updated patch with above comments incorporated. Bootstrap/regtest on BE/LE
>with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
2014-04-08 Pat Haugen
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (addti3, subti3): New.
gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.target/powerpc/ti_mat
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
> Updated patch with above comments incorporated. Bootstrap/regtest on BE/LE
> with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
2014-04-08 Pat Haugen
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (addti3, subti3): New.
gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.target/powerpc
On 04/08/2014 09:56 PM, seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
+/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
Please leave out the default arguments. Why does this need skipping
on Darwin?
+;; Define the TImode operations
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:06:58PM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
> The following patch improves the code generated for TImode add/sub so
> that we now generate a 2 insn sequence which makes use of the carry bit.
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if
The following patch improves the code generated for TImode add/sub so
that we now generate a 2 insn sequence which makes use of the carry bit.
Bootstrap/regtest (on both BE/LE) with no new failures. Ok for trunk and
4.8?
-Pat
2014-04-08 Pat Haugen
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (addti