On 10/2/17 12:10 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 12:00:55PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> On 9/29/17 5:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Looks great to me, please commit. But hold off until Monday please, it
>>> will interfere with testing otherwise.
>>
>> Ok, committed
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 12:00:55PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 9/29/17 5:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> +/* PowerPC 64-bit LE requires at least ISA 2.07. */
> >> +const char *default_cpu = ((!TARGET_POWERPC64)
> >> + ? "powerpc"
> >> +
On 9/29/17 5:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> + /* PowerPC 64-bit LE requires at least ISA 2.07. */
>> + const char *default_cpu = ((!TARGET_POWERPC64)
>> + ? "powerpc"
>> + : ((BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
>> +
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:26:00PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This patch fixes two new issues exposed (but not caused) by the original
> test case added for PR80210 as well as a modified version of that test case.
[ .. snip ... ]
This all seems correct (but it is so complex that it
This patch fixes two new issues exposed (but not caused) by the original
test case added for PR80210 as well as a modified version of that test case.
The first problem is that the test case pr80210.c ICEs on 32-bit compiles
that do not pass either an explicit or implicit -mcpu=... option.
I did