You’re right, I don’t need the -O0. I’d like to leave the dg-skip-if in place
because I’m worried about older processors not defining altivec, etc.
Thanks!
Bill
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:41:26AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Whe
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:41:26AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> When changing vec_ld and vec_st to be expanded during parsing, I
> missed a subtle case that happens only for C++. If the base address
> argument has an array type, this doesn’t get converted to a pointer.
> For our purposes, we need
Hi,
When changing vec_ld and vec_st to be expanded during parsing, I
missed a subtle case that happens only for C++. If the base address
argument has an array type, this doesn’t get converted to a pointer.
For our purposes, we need the pointer, and it’s safe to make that
conversion, so this patch
