On 3/14/18 4:27 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> 2018-03-14 Kelvin Nilsen
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_overloaded_builtins): Add
> entries for V1TI variants of __builtin_altivec_ld builtin.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (altivec_expand_lv_builtin): Add test and
> handli
On 3/14/18 4:27 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> @@ -14452,6 +14452,7 @@ altivec_expand_lv_builtin (enum insn_code icode, t
> LVXL and LVE*X expand to use UNSPECs to hide their special behavior,
> so the raw address is fine. */
>if (icode == CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v2df_2op
> + || icod
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> During code review, it was discovered that the implementation of
> __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti is not complete. The constant
> ALTIVEC_BUILTINLVX_V1TI is introduced and is bound to the function
> __builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti. However,
During code review, it was discovered that the implementation of
__builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti is not complete. The constant
ALTIVEC_BUILTINLVX_V1TI is introduced and is bound to the function
__builtin_altivec_lvx_v1ti. However, this function's implementation is
incomplete because there is no call t
