Segher,
Thanks for your comments. I have modified the patch according to your
advice and committed.
On 24/11/2020 上午 6:25, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
Sorry this took so long.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:46:01PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
On 29/9/2020 上午 6:46, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
Sorry this took so long.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 04:46:01PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> On 29/9/2020 上午 6:46, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >[ Please do not insert patches into discussions ]
So, please send new patches as a new thread. This makes it much easier
to handle. If you want to rep
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556236.html
Thanks.
Gui Haochen
On 6/11/2020 上午 9:02, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556236.html
Thanks.
Gui Haochen
On 15/10/2020 下午 4:46, HAO
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556236.html
Thanks.
Gui Haochen
On 6/11/2020 上午 9:02, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556236.html
Thanks.
Gui Haochen
On 15/10/2020 下午 4:46, HAO
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556236.html
Thanks.
Gui Haochen
On 15/10/2020 下午 4:46, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
Segher,
I re-wrote the patch based on parameterized name.
The attachments are the patch diff file and change log file.
Boots
Segher,
I re-wrote the patch based on parameterized name.
The attachments are the patch diff file and change log file.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no
regressions. Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
On 29/9/2020 上午 6:46, Segher B
Hi hao Chen,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:55:29PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Thanks for your advice. I removed macros defined in linux64.h and
> linux.h. So they take relative jump tables by default. When
> no-relative-jumptables is set, the absolute jump tables are taken. All
> things rele
Segher,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553486.html
Thanks
Gui Haochen
On 9/9/2020 下午 4:55, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
Hi Segher,
Thanks for your advice. I removed macros defined in linux64.h and
linux.h. So they take relative jump tables b
Hi Segher,
Thanks for your advice. I removed macros defined in linux64.h and
linux.h. So they take relative jump tables by default. When
no-relative-jumptables is set, the absolute jump tables are taken. All
things relevant to section relocations are put in another patch. Thanks
again.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:48:43PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> >I'll try to be quicker at reviewing iterations of this -- there is quite
> >some way to go, without me slowing things down!
Sigh :-(
> * config/rs6000/linux.h (rs6000_relative_jumptables): Define.
That macro looks like it is
Hi,
I revised the patch according to the advice. The attachment is the
change log and diff file. Thanks a lot.
On 20/8/2020 上午 8:14, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
Sorry this took so long to review. "I lost track of this patch", what
can I say :-/
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:31:05PM +0800, H
Hi!
Sorry this took so long to review. "I lost track of this patch", what
can I say :-/
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:31:05PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> This patch adds non-relative jump table support on Power Linux. It
> implements ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT and adds four new expansions for
> non
Hi,
This patch adds non-relative jump table support on Power Linux. It
implements ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT and adds four new expansions for
non-relative jump table in rs6000.md. It also defines a rs6000
option(mrelative-jumptables). If it's set to false, the non-relative
jump table is picked u
13 matches
Mail list logo
