Hi!
As I explained in the other mail, please split this into two: one the
core thing, adding the flag and all code generation (maybe using some
new macros or such for section selection, for example); and the second
patch hooking it up and enabling this by default for powerpc64* (or only
for powerp
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 04:35:57AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> The purpose should not be to exclude AIX. If there is no fundamental
> limitation with use of the new tablejump design on AIX then the patch
> is not acceptable without AIX support.
The patch should work on all subtargets. It
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:22 AM HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Seems there is something wrong with my email box. I lost your email. I
> reconfigured the box and it should be OK now.
>
> Could you inform me how to exclude AIX from the condition testing? By
> the ABI? Thanks a lot.
The purpose
David,
Seems there is something wrong with my email box. I lost your email. I
reconfigured the box and it should be OK now.
Could you inform me how to exclude AIX from the condition testing? By
the ABI? Thanks a lot.
Haochen Gui
On 2020/7/28 下午1:25, HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds non-relative jump table support for 64bit rs6000. It
> implements ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT and corresponding expansion of jump table
> instruction for 64bit rs6000. We want to put non-relative jump table in
> data.
Added more CCs.
Kewen
on 2020/7/28 下午1:25, HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds non-relative jump table support for 64bit rs6000. It
> implements ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT and corresponding expansion of jump table
> instruction for 64bit rs6000. We want to put non-relati
Hi,
This patch adds non-relative jump table support for 64bit rs6000. It
implements ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT and corresponding expansion of jump
table instruction for 64bit rs6000. We want to put non-relative jump
table in data.rel.ro section for rs6000. So I add a new target hook -
TARGET_ASM
