Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix vec_mulo and vec_mule builtin implementations

2017-06-07 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:55:28PM -0700, Carl E. Love wrote: > The support for the vec_mulo and vec_mule that was recently submitted > has a couple of bugs. Specifically, they were implemented with > int/unsigned int args and return int/unsigned int. The return types > should have been long long

[PATCH, rs6000] Fix vec_mulo and vec_mule builtin implementations

2017-06-06 Thread Carl E. Love
GCC Maintainers: The support for the vec_mulo and vec_mule that was recently submitted has a couple of bugs. Specifically, they were implemented with int/unsigned int args and return int/unsigned int. The return types should have been long long/unsigned long long. Additionally it was noted that