RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-21 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! >> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:05 AM >> OK for the trunk. >> >> Thanks for your patience, > > Thanks. Committed with the added "PR rtl-optimization/64616" to both > ChangeLog entries. This patch caused PR66236 [1]. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bug

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:05 AM > OK for the trunk. > > Thanks for your patience, Thanks. Committed with the added "PR rtl-optimization/64616" to both ChangeLog entries. Best regards, Thomas

Re: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/12/2015 03:32 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM + + /* Check that all uses reached by the def in insn wou

Re: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/12/2015 02:55 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM On 05/06/2015 03:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Ping? Something to consider as future work -- I'm pretty sure PRE sets up the same kind of problematical pattern with

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme > > > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM > > > > >> > > >> + > > >> + /* Check that all uses reached by the def in insn would still be > > r

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM > > On 05/06/2015 03:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > Ping? > Something to consider as future work -- I'm pretty sure PRE sets up the > same kind of problematical pattern with a new pseudo (reaching reg) > holding

Re: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/06/2015 03:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Ping? Something to consider as future work -- I'm pretty sure PRE sets up the same kind of problematical pattern with a new pseudo (reaching reg) holding the result of the redundant expression and the original evaluations turned into copies fro

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-06 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Ping? Best regards, Thomas > -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:39 PM > To: 'Steven Bosscher' > Cc: GCC Patches; Eric Botcazou > Subject: RE: [PATCH, stage1] M