Uros,
> I will wait for the confirmation from Rainer before committing the patch.
an i386-pc-solaris2.9 bootstrap just finished, and all the failures are
gone.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotec
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >> As noted in the PR, we also have to protect conversion from
>> >> round->lround for non-TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS targets. Otherwise, gcc
>> >> chokes in fold_fixed_mathfn, trying to canonicalize iround to
>> >> (non-existent) lround. It l
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >> As noted in the PR, we also have to protect conversion from
> >> round->lround for non-TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS targets. Otherwise, gcc
> >> chokes in fold_fixed_mathfn, trying to canonicalize i
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> As noted in the PR, we also have to protect conversion from
>> round->lround for non-TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS targets. Otherwise, gcc
>> chokes in fold_fixed_mathfn, trying to canonicalize iround to
>> (non-existent) lround. It looks to me,
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As noted in the PR, we also have to protect conversion from
> round->lround for non-TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS targets. Otherwise, gcc
> chokes in fold_fixed_mathfn, trying to canonicalize iround to
> (non-existent) lround. It looks to me, that we ca
Hello!
As noted in the PR, we also have to protect conversion from
round->lround for non-TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS targets. Otherwise, gcc
chokes in fold_fixed_mathfn, trying to canonicalize iround to
(non-existent) lround. It looks to me, that we can trigger the same
problem trying to convert (long lo
