On 07/11/2014 11:42 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/2014 05:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK?
Ok, thanks, but please adjust the dates you have on the testcases to
the date of the actual commit (I suppose today or tomorrow)
Thanks again!
Paolo.
As committed.
Thanks all for looking a
Hi,
On 07/11/2014 05:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK?
Ok, thanks, but please adjust the dates you have on the testcases to the
date of the actual commit (I suppose today or tomorrow)
Thanks again!
Paolo.
On 07/10/2014 06:16 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. I have another comment: are we sure the usual strategy:
template
result_type
operator()(_UniformRandomNumberGenerator& __urng)
{ return this->operator()(__urng, this->_M_param); }
doesn't make sense here too?
Paolo.
>> Look OK
.. I have another comment: are we sure the usual strategy:
template
result_type
operator()(_UniformRandomNumberGenerator& __urng)
{ return this->operator()(__urng, this->_M_param); }
doesn't make sense here too?
Paolo.
Hi,
On 07/10/2014 10:07 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
The title says it all.
I've been bootstrapping and testing with this on x86_64-linux for a
month.
OK?
Look OK to me too, but I would move both operator() out of line, and
definitely operator()(_UniformRandomNumberGenerator&, const param_ty
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
> The title says it all.
>
> I've been bootstrapping and testing with this on x86_64-linux for a month.
>
> OK?
Looks good to me.
The title says it all.
I've been bootstrapping and testing with this on x86_64-linux for a month.
OK?
Ed
2014-07-10 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Add the logistic_distribution as an extension.
* include/ext/random: Add the logistic_distribution.
* includ
