On 9 October 2012 22:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 20:48, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>
>> I think it is. The newlib ctype classification is identical to the
>> traditional BSD scheme that OpenBSD uses.
>
> OK, I'll commit your patch tomorrow, thanks.
it's on the trunk now, thanks for
On 9 October 2012 20:48, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> I think it is. The newlib ctype classification is identical to the
> traditional BSD scheme that OpenBSD uses.
OK, I'll commit your patch tomorrow, thanks.
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:52:22 +0100
> From: Jonathan Wakely
>
> On 8 October 2012 20:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Jonathan,
> >
> > Any further thoughts about this? I've attached a diff that combines
> > my origional diff with the change to use the "newlib" locale model on
> > OpenBSD since t
On 8 October 2012 20:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> Any further thoughts about this? I've attached a diff that combines
> my origional diff with the change to use the "newlib" locale model on
> OpenBSD since they probably should be committed together.
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, I realise
Jonathan,
Any further thoughts about this? I've attached a diff that combines
my origional diff with the change to use the "newlib" locale model on
OpenBSD since they probably should be committed together.
> > > On 10 September 2012 07:34, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > >> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:07:
>
> On 10 September 2012 07:34, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:07:39 +0100
> >> From: Jonathan Wakely
> >>
> >> On 4 September 2012 20:26, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> > Fixes a few testcases. Mostly based on the existing
> >> > NetBSD/FreeBSD/Darwin code.
> >> >
> >> > 2012-09-
On 10 September 2012 07:34, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:07:39 +0100
>> From: Jonathan Wakely
>>
>> On 4 September 2012 20:26, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > Fixes a few testcases. Mostly based on the existing
>> > NetBSD/FreeBSD/Darwin code.
>> >
>> > 2012-09-04 Mark Kettenis
>
> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 21:07:39 +0100
> From: Jonathan Wakely
>
> On 4 September 2012 20:26, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Fixes a few testcases. Mostly based on the existing
> > NetBSD/FreeBSD/Darwin code.
> >
> > 2012-09-04 Mark Kettenis
> >
> > * configure.host (*-*-openbsd*) Set cpu_i
Oops, forgot to correct the gcc-patches email address...
On 9 September 2012 21:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 4 September 2012 20:26, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Fixes a few testcases. Mostly based on the existing
>> NetBSD/FreeBSD/Darwin code.
>>
>> 2012-09-04 Mark Kettenis
>>
>> * conf
> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:55:27 +0300
> From: Jonathan Wakely
>
> I'll look at this more carefully later today when I get back from a
> holiday, but it looks ok after a quick glance.
Great!
> I've CC'd gcc-patches, as required for all patches.
Sorry 'bout that. Bit of a brain fart on my side
I'll look at this more carefully later today when I get back from a
holiday, but it looks ok after a quick glance.
I've CC'd gcc-patches, as required for all patches.
Thanks.
On Sep 4, 2012 10:27 PM, "Mark Kettenis" wrote:
>
> Fixes a few testcases. Mostly based on the existing
> NetBSD/FreeBS
Fixes a few testcases. Mostly based on the existing
NetBSD/FreeBSD/Darwin code.
2012-09-04 Mark Kettenis
* configure.host (*-*-openbsd*) Set cpu_include_dir.
* config/os/bsd/openbsd/ctype_base.h: New file.
* config/os/bsd/openbsd/ctype_configure_char.cc: New file.
12 matches
Mail list logo