On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Couldn't you instead add into a header inline functions or macros
> that map fabsq to __builtin_fabsq etc.? Then you could keep the *.c
> files as is.
> What I don't really like on the patch is that it diverges too much from the
> original libc sources
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 11:50:11PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Attached (mostly mechanical) patch uses equivalent built-in functions
> for fabsq, copysignq and nanq. The patch allows more aggressive
> compiler optimizations, where for fabsq and copysignq, the compiler
> will emit 128bit SSE bitops,
Hello!
Attached (mostly mechanical) patch uses equivalent built-in functions
for fabsq, copysignq and nanq. The patch allows more aggressive
compiler optimizations, where for fabsq and copysignq, the compiler
will emit 128bit SSE bitops, and a 128bit constant load instead of
nanq function call.
T
