Hello,
Ping!
I would like to get a return on this patch. I don't know quite well the
status of libiberty in GNU, please if I must this patch on another
mailing list, please say me on which.
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:46:57 +0200
Pierre Vittet wrote:
> Hello,
[...]
> The patch also remove a preprocessor #if testing if
> _STRING_ARCH_unaligned is defined. This symbol is never defined in gcc
> and could be only used in CFLAGS. Looking at the code, it does not looks
> usefull to define it
Hello,
The patch is the result of the following threads:
Here is a patch correcting md5_process_bytes when we are in the case of
unaligned pointers.A pair of brace was missing, leading the buffer to be
shift 2 times losing a part of its content.
The patch also remove a preprocessor #if testing