Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:17:09PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2022/6/28 10:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > > > with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: > > > > > > (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps in

[PING x2] Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

On 2022/8/26 4:15 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2022/8/4 9:31 PM, Koning, Paul wrote: >> >> >>> On Aug 4, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >>> >>> On 2022/6/28 10:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > with the way that chu

[PING] Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

On 2022/8/4 9:31 PM, Koning, Paul wrote: On Aug 4, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: On 2022/6/28 10:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: (1) chunk_size <=

Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

> On Aug 4, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > > On 2022/6/28 10:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >>> with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: >>> >>> (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps into large uns

Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

On 2022/6/28 10:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps into large unsigned value, seems to work though. (2) chunk_size == 0: infinite loop T

Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 04:06:14PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > > with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: > > > > (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps into large unsigned value, seems to work

Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: > > (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps into large unsigned value, seems to work though. > (2) chunk_size == 0: infinite loop > > The (2) behavior is obviously not de

[PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule

Hi Jakub, with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next: (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps into large unsigned value, seems to work though. (2) chunk_size == 0: infinite loop The (2) behavior is obviously not desired. This patch fixes this by changing the chunk_size initializ