On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:09:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>
>>> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not
>>> work
>>> together with #pra
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
Well, this way it could be fixed too.
But opts->x_ix86_preferred_stack_bounary_arg is not dependent on any
pragma or target attribute. Correct me if that is wrong.
>>>
>>> That seems correct.
>>>
And this code
>
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:09:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>
>> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not
>> work
>> together with #pragma GCC target("sse") or
>> __attribute__((target("sse"
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not work
> together with #pragma GCC target("sse") or
> __attribute__((target("sse"))).
>
> There is already a test case that detects th
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:50:27, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bernd Edlinger
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:30:16, Srirama
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:50:27, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bernd Edlinger
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:30:16, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Uros B
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:30:16, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
There was something wrong with Bernd's address
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:30:16, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> There was something wrong with Bernd's address, retrying.
>>>
> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stac
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:30:16, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> There was something wrong with Bernd's address, retrying.
>>
Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not work
together with #pragma GCC target("sse
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> There was something wrong with Bernd's address, retrying.
>
>>> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not work
>>> together with #pragma GCC target("sse") or __attribute__((target("sse"))).
>>>
>>> There is already a te
There was something wrong with Bernd's address, retrying.
>> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not work
>> together with #pragma GCC target("sse") or __attribute__((target("sse"))).
>>
>> There is already a test case that detects this:
>> gcc.target/i386/fastcall-ssere
Hello!
> Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not work
> together with #pragma GCC target("sse") or __attribute__((target("sse"))).
>
> There is already a test case that detects this:
> gcc.target/i386/fastcall-sseregparm.c
>
> The attached patch fixes this test case unde
Currently on trunk the option -mpreferred-stack-boundary does not work
together with #pragma GCC target("sse") or __attribute__((target("sse"))).
There is already a test case that detects this:
gcc.target/i386/fastcall-sseregparm.c
The attached patch fixes this test case under i686-pc-linux-gnu.
13 matches
Mail list logo