[PATCH, i386]: Improve LIMIT_RELOAD_CLASSES

2012-08-09 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >>> Without this, on the new testcase we hit the assert in >>> inline_secondary_memory_needed. The comment before the function states: >>> >>> The macro can't work reliably when one of the CLASSES is class >>> containing registers from multip

[RFC PATCH, i386]: Improve LIMIT_RELOAD_CLASSES [was: Reload/i386 patch for secondary memory vs subregs]

2012-08-04 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> Without this, on the new testcase we hit the assert in >> inline_secondary_memory_needed. The comment before the function states: >> >> The macro can't work reliably when one of the CLASSES is class >> containing registers from multiple u