On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Uros Bizjak writes:
>
>> testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2016-06-12 Uros Bizjak
>>
>> PR target/71241
>> * testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float128-nan.c: New test.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
>
> The
Uros Bizjak writes:
> testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2016-06-12 Uros Bizjak
>
> PR target/71241
> * testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float128-nan.c: New test.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
The test FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86:
output is:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> Hmm, as we already have BUILT_IN_NAN[S] why not add NAN128 and NANS128
> variants in the middle-end as we already have NAND128 (for decimal float
> 128)?
The middle-end does not know anything about the target-specific __float128
type.
Now, I'm looki
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Attached patch implements __builtin_nanq and __builtin_nansq
>> __float128 functions.
>>
>> 2016-06-10 Uros Bizjak
>>
>> PR target/71241
>> * config/i386/i386.i386-builtin
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attached patch implements __builtin_nanq and __builtin_nansq
> __float128 functions.
>
> 2016-06-10 Uros Bizjak
>
> PR target/71241
> * config/i386/i386.i386-builtin-types.def (CONST_STRING):
> New primitive type.
> (FLOAT1
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Joseph Myers
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>>> Joseph, does it look OK to you? Richi, I hope I got tree stuff
>>> implemented correctly.
>>
>> It's plausible, but really needs testcas
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> Joseph, does it look OK to you? Richi, I hope I got tree stuff
>> implemented correctly.
>
> It's plausible, but really needs testcases (which could examine the
> bit-patterns of __float128 objects
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Joseph, does it look OK to you? Richi, I hope I got tree stuff
> implemented correctly.
It's plausible, but really needs testcases (which could examine the
bit-patterns of __float128 objects initialized using these built-in
functions, to make sure those
Hello!
Attached patch implements __builtin_nanq and __builtin_nansq
__float128 functions.
2016-06-10 Uros Bizjak
PR target/71241
* config/i386/i386.i386-builtin-types.def (CONST_STRING):
New primitive type.
(FLOAT128_FTYPE_CONST_STRING): New function type.
* config/i386/i3