ember 14, 2012 4:15 PM
To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: AMD bdver3 enablement
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
>> sseshuf replaces sselog in some insn patterns, but should be handled in the
>> s
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
>> sseshuf replaces sselog in some insn patterns, but should be handled in the
>> same way in *existing* .md files.
>
> Modifications done as per the comments.
> 1. Sseshuf is added along with sselog in existing md files.
> 2. ss
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
>> You can see from the changes of sse.md that this is functionally a no-op
>> change.
> Sseshuf replaces sselog.
> So, do you mean it should be added with sselog instead of sseadd?
> Adding it with sseadd (instead of sselog) influ
essage-
From: Uros Bizjak [mailto:ubiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:30 AM
To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: AMD bdver3 enablement
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Changes done with respe
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Changes done with respect to the review comments.
> Conditionally setting "sseshuf" type attribute has been removed.
> Instead new attribute is added and is included for other attribute
> calculations.
>
> The patch is attached a
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> Couple of changes done with respect to the review comments.
>
> 1. sseshuf type attribute is handled in unit attribute calculation.
> 2. sseadd1 instruction attribute is handled in the new scheduler descriptions.
>
> The patch is a
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
wrote:
> The attached patch (Patch.txt) enables the next version of AMD's bulldozer
> core.
Please handle new sseshuf type attribute in various attribute
calculations. You should at least add it to unit attribute
calculation, but please