Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add gfc_define_builtin_with_spec

2015-04-21 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:37:00 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > For the oacc kernels patch series I need a fortran builtin with fn spec > attribute (as mentioned here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-12/msg1.html ). > > Attached patch adds a function gfc_define_builtin_with_spec that allows

Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add gfc_define_builtin_with_spec

2015-01-10 Thread FX
>> If unused on trunk, why would we commit it there? >> When your branch is merged, you'll merge it along. Otherwise that defeats >> the purpose of working on a branch, unless I misunderstand something... > > This patch is not branch-specific. As far as I understand, we don’t add unused code to

Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add gfc_define_builtin_with_spec

2015-01-09 Thread Tom de Vries
On 09-01-15 18:11, FX wrote: If unused on trunk, why would we commit it there? When your branch is merged, you'll merge it along. Otherwise that defeats the purpose of working on a branch, unless I misunderstand something... This patch is not branch-specific. Thanks, - Tom FX Le 9 janv

Re: [PATCH, fortran] Add gfc_define_builtin_with_spec

2015-01-09 Thread FX
If unused on trunk, why would we commit it there? When your branch is merged, you'll merge it along. Otherwise that defeats the purpose of working on a branch, unless I misunderstand something... FX > Le 9 janv. 2015 à 16:37, Tom de Vries a écrit : > > Jakub, > > For the oacc kernels patch

[PATCH, fortran] Add gfc_define_builtin_with_spec

2015-01-09 Thread Tom de Vries
Jakub, For the oacc kernels patch series I need a fortran builtin with fn spec attribute (as mentioned here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-12/msg1.html ). Attached patch adds a function gfc_define_builtin_with_spec that allows me to define such a builtin. At this point there's no user