On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:06:45PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mfctidz\M|\mxscvdpsxds\M} 2 } } */
> >
> > You could write {\m(fctidz|xscvdpsxds)\M} which may be easier to read.
> > Come to think of it, we could do e.g. {\m(lwz)\M} as well. Not s
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:21:15AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:46:04AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > One thing that I did was continue to define __UPPER_REGS_{DF,SF,DI}__ that
> > were
> > previously defined. I can delete them if desired and pe
Hi Mike,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:46:04AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> One thing that I did was continue to define __UPPER_REGS_{DF,SF,DI}__ that
> were
> previously defined. I can delete them if desired and perhaps poison the names
> so that any use if flaged.
I don't think anything uses
The -mupper-regs-{df,di,sf} debug options that I added in previoius versions of
GCC to control whether DFmode, DImode, or SFmode could go in the traditional
Altivec registers has outlived its usefulness. This patch deletes the
options. I fixed up the various tests that used the option, and delete
