On Feb 09 2022, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:36:57PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Feb 08 2022, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> > Can you please clarify one thing for me. Do you think it's possible
>> > that we can come up with some type of configure patch t
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:36:57PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Feb 08 2022, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Can you please clarify one thing for me. Do you think it's possible
> > that we can come up with some type of configure patch that automatically
> > sets the long double default
On Feb 08 2022, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Can you please clarify one thing for me. Do you think it's possible
> that we can come up with some type of configure patch that automatically
> sets the long double default given something on the system we can test
> for or do you think that's impossible an
On 2/4/22 4:26 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> As I said before, I didn't even read the patch, just the one line
> summary was enough for a NAK. If the patch in fact does something else,
> then it is still incorrect, and needs a very different subject and
> summary.
>
> I hope you see how "using
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 02:10:03PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 2/4/22 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>> If the user did not specify a default long double for
On 2/4/22 12:03 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring
>>> GCC, use the long double default from the host
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring
> > GCC, use the long double default from the host compiler.
>
> That doesn't make any sense. The
On Feb 04 2022, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote:
> If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring
> GCC, use the long double default from the host compiler.
That doesn't make any sense. The host compiler can be any random
compiler completely unrelated to the tar
Use system default for long double unless it is overridden.
If the user did not specify a default long double format when configuring
GCC, use the long double default from the host compiler.
I tested this on the following systems. There were no regressions:
* Big endian Linux power8 using
