Hello,
>> + if (reg_mentioned_p (reg, insn) && !DEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
>
> It probably makes sense to test for !DEBUG_INSN_P first, since it's much
> cheaper.
Thanks, will commit the following to fix that:
* modulo-sched.c (doloop_register_get): Check !DEBUG_INSN_P
first.
Inde
On May 8, 2011, Revital Eres wrote:
> +if (reg_mentioned_p (reg, insn) && !DEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
It probably makes sense to test for !DEBUG_INSN_P first, since it's much
cheaper.
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhttp://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the
> OK for mainline?
Yes, this is pretty obvious. (You don't have to change to
prev_nondebug_insn btw).
Ayal.
From: Revital Eres
To: Ayal Zaks/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Patch Tracking
Date: 08/05/2011 07:37 AM
Subject: [PATCH, SMS 2/3] Skip DEB
Hello,
The attached patch adds code to skip DEBUG_INSNs while recognizing
doloop pattern.
The patch was tested together with the rest of the patches in this series
and on top of the patch to support do-loop for ARM (not yet in mainline,
but approved http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01
