eOn 31 Jul 14:07, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-06-11 12:22 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
> >>
> >> Does it look OK
2014-06-11 12:22 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>>
>> Does it look OK?
>
> Ugh, this looks terribly ugly. So you are chan
2014-06-11 12:55 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:44:29PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> 2014-06-11 12:22 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> >> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
>> >
2014-06-11 13:00 GMT+04:00 Marek Polacek :
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>>
>> Does it look OK?
>
> I haven't followed the Pointer Bounds Checker d
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>
> Does it look OK?
I haven't followed the Pointer Bounds Checker development, only looked at
some of the patches, but
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:44:29PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2014-06-11 12:22 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>
2014-06-11 12:22 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>>
>> Does it look OK?
>
> Ugh, this looks terribly ugly. So you are chan
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>
> Does it look OK?
Ugh, this looks terribly ugly. So you are changing the meaning of arguments
of every single built
Hi,
This patch adds instrumented code support for strlen optimization.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-06-09 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-ssa-strlen.c: include tree-chkp.h.
(get_string_length): Handle calls with bounds.
(a