On 23 Sep 09:55, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/22/14 00:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >
> >Bounds don't have to vary for different pointers. E.g. p and p + 1
> >always have equal bounds. In this particular case we have function
> >pointers and all of them have default bounds.
> OK. It looked a bit odd an
On 09/22/14 00:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Bounds don't have to vary for different pointers. E.g. p and p + 1
always have equal bounds. In this particular case we have function
pointers and all of them have default bounds.
OK. It looked a bit odd and I wanted to make sure there wasn't
something
2014-09-19 23:45 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 09/16/14 03:09, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I must be misunderstanding something then. I fundamentally don't see how
>>> the return bounds are any different here than the return value. If we
>>> have
>>> exposed the bounds in the IL, then aren't the
On 09/16/14 03:09, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I must be misunderstanding something then. I fundamentally don't see how
the return bounds are any different here than the return value. If we have
exposed the bounds in the IL, then aren't they going to be handled just like
any other object in the IL?
2014-09-16 1:08 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 09/15/14 10:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
A problem I'm trying to avoid is that bounds in return statement are
not taken into account when checking for data dependencies between
parts. It means we may have a case when return statement w
On 09/15/14 10:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
A problem I'm trying to avoid is that bounds in return statement are
not taken into account when checking for data dependencies between
parts. It means we may have a case when return statement with bounds
is put into split part but bounds producer is not.
2014-09-15 19:39 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 09/15/14 03:51, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-08-15 Ilya Enkovich
* ipa-split.c: Include tree-chkp.h.
(find_retbnd): New.
(consider_split): Do not split retbnd and retval
producers.
On 09/15/14 03:51, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-08-15 Ilya Enkovich
* ipa-split.c: Include tree-chkp.h.
(find_retbnd): New.
(consider_split): Do not split retbnd and retval
producers.
(split_function): Propagate Pointer Bounds Checker
instrum
2014-09-03 23:12 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 08/18/14 09:55, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> On 04 Jun 01:15, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/03/14 01:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch does not allow splitting in case bounds are returned until
retutrned bounds are supported.
On 08/18/14 09:55, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 04 Jun 01:15, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/03/14 01:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch does not allow splitting in case bounds are returned until retutrned
bounds are supported. It also propagates instrumentation marks for generated
call and function
On 04 Jun 01:15, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/03/14 01:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch does not allow splitting in case bounds are returned until
> >retutrned bounds are supported. It also propagates instrumentation marks
> >for generated call and function.
> >
> >Bootstrapped and t
2014-06-04 11:15 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 06/03/14 01:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch does not allow splitting in case bounds are returned until
>> retutrned bounds are supported. It also propagates instrumentation marks
>> for generated call and function.
>>
>> Bootstrapped a
On 06/03/14 01:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch does not allow splitting in case bounds are returned until retutrned
bounds are supported. It also propagates instrumentation marks for generated
call and function.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-06-
Hi,
This patch does not allow splitting in case bounds are returned until retutrned
bounds are supported. It also propagates instrumentation marks for generated
call and function.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-06-03 Ilya Enkovich
* ipa-split.c
14 matches
Mail list logo
