On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2012 3:09 PM, "Richard Guenther"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> > wrote:
>> >> PR testsuite/16464 notes that
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> PR testsuite/16464 notes that some g77/*.f that contain loops were not
>> compiled with loop flags.
>> Compiling only testcases with loop optimization that contain
>>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> PR testsuite/16464 notes that some g77/*.f that contain loops were not
> compiled with loop flags.
> Compiling only testcases with loop optimization that contain
> "endfor/enddo" will lead to ~25% fewer tests (some 3 in
Hi,
PR testsuite/16464 notes that some g77/*.f that contain loops were not
compiled with loop flags.
Compiling only testcases with loop optimization that contain
"endfor/enddo" will lead to ~25% fewer tests (some 3 instead of
previously 4).
Testing in progess, ok if this completes success
