On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 27 Jan 12:29, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>> > On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is
>> >
On 27 Jan 12:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ilya Enkovich
> wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
> >> fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still us
On 27 Jan 12:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ilya Enkovich
> wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
> >> fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still us
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
>> fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still useful to avoid dead
>> code generated by complete unro
On 27 Jan 12:40, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
> fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still useful to avoid dead
> code generated by complete unroll.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Hi,
This patch was supposed to fix PR tree-optimization/64277. Tracker is now
fixed by warnings disabling but I think patch is still useful to avoid dead
code generated by complete unroll.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-01-27 Ilya Enkovich