Re: [PATCH, PR 64192] Add forgotten conversion from bits to bytes

2014-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/05/14 09:13, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> at some point I lost an important division of bit offset by >> BITS_PER_UNIT in my alignment IPA-CP propagation patch. That lead to a >> few failures on i686 reported as PR 64192. >> >> This

Re: [PATCH, PR 64192] Add forgotten conversion from bits to bytes

2014-12-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/05/14 09:13, Martin Jambor wrote: Hi, at some point I lost an important division of bit offset by BITS_PER_UNIT in my alignment IPA-CP propagation patch. That lead to a few failures on i686 reported as PR 64192. This patch adds it together with a slight improvement of the guarding check w

Re: [PATCH, PR 64192] Add forgotten conversion from bits to bytes

2014-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > at some point I lost an important division of bit offset by > BITS_PER_UNIT in my alignment IPA-CP propagation patch. That lead to a > few failures on i686 reported as PR 64192. > > This patch adds it together with a slight improvement

[PATCH, PR 64192] Add forgotten conversion from bits to bytes

2014-12-05 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, at some point I lost an important division of bit offset by BITS_PER_UNIT in my alignment IPA-CP propagation patch. That lead to a few failures on i686 reported as PR 64192. This patch adds it together with a slight improvement of the guarding check which I suppose will never trigger but it d