On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:17:52AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Eh ... :/
> >
> > I'm extremely nervous about this change. I also believe the change
> > is unrelated to the issue in the bugreport (even if it happens to
> > fix the ICE).
> >
> > Le
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:03:42PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:11:22PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:03:42PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:11:22PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > > > Hi Jakub and/or Joseph,
> > > >
> > > > the re
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:03:42PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:11:22PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > > Hi Jakub and/or Joseph,
> > >
> > > the reporter of this bug seems to be very anxious to have it
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:11:22PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hi Jakub and/or Joseph,
> >
> > the reporter of this bug seems to be very anxious to have it fixed in
> > the repository. While Richi is away, do you think you
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:11:22PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi Jakub and/or Joseph,
>
> the reporter of this bug seems to be very anxious to have it fixed in
> the repository. While Richi is away, do you think you could have a
> look? It is very small.
Isn't this ABI incompatible change (a
Hi Jakub and/or Joseph,
the reporter of this bug seems to be very anxious to have it fixed in
the repository. While Richi is away, do you think you could have a
look? It is very small.
Thanks a lot,
Martin
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:45:31PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while comput
ping^2
david
On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:31 PM, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ping. Any news of the following patch being included into the trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> david
>
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while compute_record_mode in stor-layout.c makes sure i
Hi,
Ping. Any news of the following patch being included into the trunk?
Thanks,
david
On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while compute_record_mode in stor-layout.c makes sure it assigns BLK
> mode to structs with flexible arrays, it has no such provisions for
> zero le
Hi,
Ping. Any news of the following patch being included into the trunk?
Thanks,
david
On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while compute_record_mode in stor-layout.c makes sure it assigns BLK
> mode to structs with flexible arrays, it has no such provisions for
> zero le
Hi,
while compute_record_mode in stor-layout.c makes sure it assigns BLK
mode to structs with flexible arrays, it has no such provisions for
zero length arrays
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.1/gcc/Zero-Length.html). I
think that in order to avoid problems and surprises like PR 57748
(wher
11 matches
Mail list logo
