On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When SRA tries to modify an assignment where on one side it should put
> a new scalar replacement but the other is actually an aggregate with
> a number of replacements for it, it will generate MEM-REFs into the
> former replacement w
Hi,
When SRA tries to modify an assignment where on one side it should put
a new scalar replacement but the other is actually an aggregate with
a number of replacements for it, it will generate MEM-REFs into the
former replacement which can lead to miscompilations.
This is avoided by the simple p
