Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 2/2] Add MPX tests

2014-11-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/11/14 13:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote: tests are compiled ignoring CPUID, mpx.exp only checks tests may be compiled (i.e. binutils support MPX, runtime wasn't disabled etc.). All MPX binaries are supposed to work correctly on hardware without MPX, we just shouldn't expect any bound violations de

Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 2/2] Add MPX tests

2014-11-11 Thread Ilya Enkovich
2014-11-11 22:55 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law : > On 11/11/14 11:42, Mike Stump wrote: >> >> On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >>> >>> This patch adds simple runtime MPX tests. >>> >>> Make check shows no fails for mpx.exp suite for >>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu{-m32,-mx32,}. OK for trunk? >

Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 2/2] Add MPX tests

2014-11-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/11/14 11:42, Mike Stump wrote: On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: This patch adds simple runtime MPX tests. Make check shows no fails for mpx.exp suite for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu{-m32,-mx32,}. OK for trunk? Ok with any changes necessary for: I’m assuming that this w

Re: [PATCH, MPX runtime 2/2] Add MPX tests

2014-11-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: > This patch adds simple runtime MPX tests. > > Make check shows no fails for mpx.exp suite for > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu{-m32,-mx32,}. OK for trunk? Ok with any changes necessary for: I’m assuming that this won’t break i386 (targets without