Moore, Catherine writes:
> > As this is an ABI fix, just wait a day or so in case Catherine has
> > any comment otherwise OK to commit.
> >
> I have not further comments on this patch. Please commit.
Hi Sameera,
I've been considering this patch further and have realised that my review
was preo
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:35 AM
> To: Sameera Deshpande ; Moore,
> Catherine
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH, MIPS] Calling convention differs depending
y 2017 14:10:52
> To: Matthew Fortune
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH, MIPS] Calling convention differs depending on the
> presence of MSA
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Please find attached the patch to fix the calling convention issue,
> where argument and result passi
Deshpande
Sent: 08 February 2017 14:10:52
To: Matthew Fortune
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH, MIPS] Calling convention differs depending on the presence of
MSA
Hi Matthew,
Please find attached the patch to fix the calling convention issue,
where argument and result passing convention
Hi Matthew,
Please find attached the patch to fix the calling convention issue,
where argument and result passing convention differed for MSA and
non-MSA variants.
The implementation of TARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY is altered to block V4SF to be
returned in registers.
Ok for trunk?
- Thanks and r
