On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:24:30 +0200 (CEST)
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > By the way, I am quite happy of Pierre patches to the MELT branch. Is
> > this enough to get him a write access to GCC SVN (all legalese is done)?
> > I fear that to really get
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> By the way, I am quite happy of Pierre patches to the MELT branch. Is
> this enough to get him a write access to GCC SVN (all legalese is done)?
> I fear that to really get that write access, Pierre would also need to
> have accepted patches to
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:47:57 +0200
Pierre Vittet wrote:
> I have corrected my patch with your remarks.
>
> Especially about the debug functions, it takes the debug melt flag into
> account. Moreover, I have allowed the user to give a message when
> calling this function, as usual in MELT debug
I have corrected my patch with your remarks.
Especially about the debug functions, it takes the debug melt flag into
account. Moreover, I have allowed the user to give a message when
calling this function, as usual in MELT debug functions. Giving this
message was a bit difficult (This is the o
On Wed, 18 May 2011 21:04:39 +0200
Pierre Vittet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have written a patch to allow the use of the GCC dominance functions
> into MELT.
[...]
> Changelog:
> 2011-05-17 Pierre Vittet
>
> * melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt
> (is_dominance_info_available, is_post_dominanc
Hello,
I have written a patch to allow the use of the GCC dominance functions
into MELT.
This is made in order to abstract the use of calculate_dominance_info
and free_dominance_info:
If the user use one of the MELT dominance related functions, it
will only call calculate_dominance_info
