Re: [PATCH, GCC 5 branch] Fix compile time regression caused by fix to PR64111

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Caroline Tice wrote: > Here is my promised backport to the GCC 5 branch, for the patch below > that went into ToT last week. As with the previous patch, I've > verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new > regression test failures. Is this ok to

[PATCH, GCC 5 branch] Fix compile time regression caused by fix to PR64111

Here is my promised backport to the GCC 5 branch, for the patch below that went into ToT last week. As with the previous patch, I've verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new regression test failures. Is this ok to commit to the gcc-5-branch? -- Caroline Tice cmt...@google.co

[PATCH, GCC 5 branch] Fix compile time regression caused by fix to PR64111

Here is my promised backport to the GCC 5 branch, for the patch below that went into ToT last week. As with the previous patch, I've verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new regression test failures. Is this ok to commit to the gcc-5-branch? -- Caroline Tice cmt...@google.co