On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 21:54 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 09:02 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 14:55 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:53:31AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > > > Great. Jakub, were you going to commit your cha
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 09:02 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 14:55 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:53:31AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > > Great. Jakub, were you going to commit your change or did you want me
> > > to do that?
> >
> > I haven't test
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 14:55 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:53:31AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Great. Jakub, were you going to commit your change or did you want me
> > to do that?
>
> I haven't tested it, you did, so please do that yourself. Thanks.
I tested it on
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:53:31AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Great. Jakub, were you going to commit your change or did you want me
> to do that?
I haven't tested it, you did, so please do that yourself. Thanks.
Jakub
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 10:12 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 20:37 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:03:44PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> >> > Ok, then I'll bootstrap and regtest your suggested
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 20:37 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:03:44PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> > Ok, then I'll bootstrap and regtest your suggested change while we
>> > wait for richi to comment. I'm fine with w
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 20:37 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:03:44PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Ok, then I'll bootstrap and regtest your suggested change while we
> > wait for richi to comment. I'm fine with whatever you and richi
> > decide is best. The ObjC guys sho
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:03:44PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Ok, then I'll bootstrap and regtest your suggested change while we
> wait for richi to comment. I'm fine with whatever you and richi
> decide is best. The ObjC guys should probably test it though too.
>
> I assume you think we shou
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:55 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 01:43:33PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Commenting on Richard's question from the bugzilla:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708#c10
> >
> > I suppose if attribute((__aligned__)) truly does
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 01:43:33PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Commenting on Richard's question from the bugzilla:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708#c10
>
> I suppose if attribute((__aligned__)) truly does just set a minimum alignment
> value (and the documentation seems t
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 11:58 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> I'm hitting the same bug as in PR53708 when compiling GLIBC's dlfcn.c when
> vectorization is enabled on powerpc64-linux. A reduced test case is:
>
> bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> cat foo.i
> static void (*const init_array []) (void)
> __attr
I'm hitting the same bug as in PR53708 when compiling GLIBC's dlfcn.c when
vectorization is enabled on powerpc64-linux. A reduced test case is:
bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS> cat foo.i
static void (*const init_array []) (void)
__attribute__ ((section (".init_array"), aligned (sizeof (void *)), used))
12 matches
Mail list logo
