On 09/26/2016 03:55 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
How about this reworked patch?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 17:17, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/23/2016 09:42 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Sorry, forgot the patch. Please find it attached.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 16:40, Thomas Pre
How about this reworked patch?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 17:17, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/23/2016 09:42 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Sorry, forgot the patch. Please find it attached.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 16:40, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
New builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c
Hi Martin,
On 23/09/16 17:17, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/23/2016 09:42 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Sorry, forgot the patch. Please find it attached.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 16:40, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
New builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c testcase contains a few regex of the form
"
On 09/23/2016 09:42 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Sorry, forgot the patch. Please find it attached.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 16:40, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
New builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c testcase contains a few regex of the form
"\[0-9\]+
bytes" or ". bytes". This does not account
Sorry, forgot the patch. Please find it attached.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 23/09/16 16:40, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
New builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c testcase contains a few regex of the form "\[0-9\]+
bytes" or ". bytes". This does not account for the case where the number of byte
is 0 in whic
Hi,
New builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c testcase contains a few regex of the form "\[0-9\]+
bytes" or ". bytes". This does not account for the case where the number of byte
is 0 in which case byte would be in the singular form. This caused a FAIL on
arm-none-eabi targets. This patch makes the s optio
