On 11/30/2017 09:40 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Effective target fstack_protector fails to return an error for
> newlib-based target (such as arm-none-eabi targets) which does not
> support stack protector. This is due to the test being too simplist for
> stack protection code to be gen
Hi,
Effective target fstack_protector fails to return an error for
newlib-based target (such as arm-none-eabi targets) which does not
support stack protector. This is due to the test being too simplist for
stack protection code to be generated by GCC: it does not contain a
local buffer and does n
