On 13/01/17 18:17, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> Ping ARM maintainers? (target independent part ACKed by Jeff)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> On 03/01/17 17:19, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> On 12/12/16 17:52, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The
Ping ARM maintainers? (target independent part ACKed by Jeff)
Best regards,
Thomas
On 03/01/17 17:19, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 12/12/16 17:52, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
The logic to make -mthumb optional for Thumb-only devices is only executed when
no -mar
Hi Jeff,
On 06/01/17 21:12, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/03/2017 10:19 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
Best regards,
Generic parts seem fine to me. They may be a bit specific to arm right now, but
we can generalize as needed in the future.
What's too ARM specific about it? The default_mode pro
On 01/03/2017 10:19 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
Best regards,
Generic parts seem fine to me. They may be a bit specific to arm right
now, but we can generalize as needed in the future.
jeff
Ping?
Best regards,
Thomas
On 12/12/16 17:52, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Hi,
The logic to make -mthumb optional for Thumb-only devices is only executed when
no -marm or -mthumb is given on the command-line. This includes configuring GCC
with --with-mode= because this makes the option to be pass
